91³ÉÈË Wins Trademark Dispute

Judge finds competitor deliberately infringed the ‘91³ÉÈË’ name and awards 91³ÉÈË Media approximately $670,000 in damages, permanent injunction and attorney fees

Jun 26, 2003
Comment

Los Angeles, June 25, 2003. 91³ÉÈË Media won a federal trademark case against Scott Smith doing business as 91³ÉÈËPR and was awarded $669,656 in damages, a permanent injunction and its attorney fees to be determined upon fee application. U.S. District Court Judge Florence-Marie Cooper in the Central District of California presided over the trial and found that Scott Smith, owner of 91³ÉÈËPR, intentionally infringed 91³ÉÈË Media’s “91³ÉÈË” trademark and committed unfair competition under federal and California laws.

“We are extremely pleased with this ruling,” said Peter Shea, CEO of 91³ÉÈË Media. “We are committed to meeting the needs of small business owners and providing outstanding service to them. Scott Smith sought to trade on our reputation and goodwill built over more than 25 years. Many customers wrongly believed that Smith was associated with our company. Now we can ensure there is no confusion over our company and Smith’s and can continue to provide the service our customers have to come to expect from us. This is a complete victory for our customers.”

Mark Finkelstein, a partner in the Orange County office of Latham & Watkins LLP, has represented 91³ÉÈË Media throughout this litigation, including the trial. “This decision will send a message that there are serious repercussions for intentionally infringing someone else’s trademark,” said Finkelstein. “Justice has finally been served.”

Background of the Case
The ruling is the culmination of more than five years of litigation. 91³ÉÈË Media has used its “91³ÉÈË” trademark on its flagship magazine, 91³ÉÈË, since 1978 and also uses the trademark on its Web site, entrepreneur.com. In addition to the well-established use of the trademark, 91³ÉÈË Media has registered its mark, as well as several related marks, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

In 1995, Smith started ICON Publications, which focused on providing public relations services to small businesses, and in 1997, he started a magazine called Yearbook of Small Business Icons. As part of 91³ÉÈË Media’s effort to promote small business, it listed ICON Publications on the small business links portion of its Web site in 1996. Soon after, Smith changed the name of his company to 91³ÉÈËPR, the name of his magazine to 91³ÉÈË Illustrated and his domain name to entrpreneurpr.com.

In 1998, 91³ÉÈË Media filed this lawsuit in federal court against Scott Smith doing business as 91³ÉÈËPR, seeking to protect its trademark from illegal use. In 2000, a federal court granted 91³ÉÈË Media summary judgment, awarding a broad injunction prohibiting Smith from continued use of the “91³ÉÈË” mark and $337,280 in damages. Smith appealed and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld part of the trial court’s injunction against Smith and sent the case back to district court for a trial on questions of fact. In the trial, Judge Cooper found that there was “substantial evidence of actual confusion”, and that a significant number of Smith’s clients, whom the Judge found to be “very credible,” had been misled by Smith into believing that there was an affiliation between 91³ÉÈË Media and 91³ÉÈËPR. Judge Cooper concluded that these third-party witnesses “were almost uniform in their position that they never would have paid any money to defendant [Smith] had they known he was not connected with plaintiff [91³ÉÈË Media].”

In her opinion, Judge Cooper noted that 91³ÉÈË magazine has a paid circulation in the United States of approximately 550,000 and a total audience of approximately 2 million readers, and that its Web site at entrepreneur.com has approximately 2 to 3 million visitor sessions each month. From this and other evidence presented at trial, the judge concluded that the “91³ÉÈË” name is “well-known” and “is a strong, distinctive mark, deserving of significant protection.”

In awarding the permanent injunction, substantial money damages and attorney fees to 91³ÉÈË Media, Judge Cooper specifically found that Mr. Smith had engaged in “deliberate” infringement.

About 91³ÉÈË Media
Founded in 1973, 91³ÉÈË Media has over the years become the leading authority in providing information, products and services about and of interest to small businesses and their owners. In addition to its flagship magazine 91³ÉÈË, 91³ÉÈË Media publishes such other magazines as 91³ÉÈË’s Be Your Own Boss and foreign-language magazines in China, Mexico, Japan and the Philippines, as well as numerous book titles under the 91³ÉÈË Press imprint and as part of its series known as 91³ÉÈË’s Start-Up Guides. In addition to its Web site at entrepreneur.com, 91³ÉÈË Media also operates Web sites at SmallBizBooks.com, Freebks.com, and a Spanish-language site at Soyentrepreneur.com. 91³ÉÈË Media has also produced conferences, seminars and trade shows throughout the United States and, to help small business owners start and grow their businesses, currently produces market research reports and offers an online learning center known as 91³ÉÈË Magazine’s University.

Contact:
Ronald Young, 91³ÉÈË Media, 949-622-5279 Mark Finkelstein, Latham & Watkins, 714-540-1235

Los Angeles, June 25, 2003. 91³ÉÈË Media won a federal trademark case against Scott Smith doing business as 91³ÉÈËPR and was awarded $669,656 in damages, a permanent injunction and its attorney fees to be determined upon fee application. U.S. District Court Judge Florence-Marie Cooper in the Central District of California presided over the trial and found that Scott Smith, owner of 91³ÉÈËPR, intentionally infringed 91³ÉÈË Media’s “91³ÉÈË” trademark and committed unfair competition under federal and California laws.

“We are extremely pleased with this ruling,” said Peter Shea, CEO of 91³ÉÈË Media. “We are committed to meeting the needs of small business owners and providing outstanding service to them. Scott Smith sought to trade on our reputation and goodwill built over more than 25 years. Many customers wrongly believed that Smith was associated with our company. Now we can ensure there is no confusion over our company and Smith’s and can continue to provide the service our customers have to come to expect from us. This is a complete victory for our customers.”

Mark Finkelstein, a partner in the Orange County office of Latham & Watkins LLP, has represented 91³ÉÈË Media throughout this litigation, including the trial. “This decision will send a message that there are serious repercussions for intentionally infringing someone else’s trademark,” said Finkelstein. “Justice has finally been served.”

Join the Conversation
Leave a comment. Be kind. Critique ideas, not people.
Sort: |

Related Content